News
Local activists praise Obama speech on race
Top Headlines Obama, D-Ill., this week explained the different ways whites and blacks view the world in an insightful speech that few politicians are able or willing to make, they said. But, those who were offended by the pastor's comments critical of the United States are unlikely to be moved, they said. "His foes will always find fault," Democratic activist Ken Cabral of Norton said. "They will continue to use this against him." Ellen Parker of Attleboro, a member of the Democratic State Committee and a Hillary Clinton supporter, said people are still going to question why Obama stayed in a church where the pastor was preaching such divisive things. She said Internet video of the preacher will be shown over and over again to remind voters of his views. The pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, made comments blaming the United States for the attack on Sept. 11, criticizing America for dropping atomic bombs on Japan during World War II and saying Clinton can never know what it is like to be a black man. In his speech, Obama rejected Wright's most controversial statements, but also asked that blacks and whites try to understand the perspective of the other. He said blacks view events from the legacy of slavery and discrimination while whites struggling to get by can feel resentful of affirmative action. Although some observers said Obama's speech Tuesday would not change the political situation, the style and substance of the address were widely praised. "Barack's speech today was as honest, candid, and compelling a statement about healing racial divisions as I've ever heard," U.S. Sen. John Kerry said in a statement to The Sun Chronicle. "He challenged white and black America to confront our twisted history and move forward together. He made it very clear that while we must all denounce racist and inflammatory statements no matter where they come from or whom they offend, we must also move forward as a united people to achieve health care for all, and put our economy back on track." Cabral said Obama did an outstanding job trying to explain to white Americans what it is like to be black. "White folks have no idea what the black experience is like," he said. "Race is something that needs to be talked about," Joseph Kaplan of Mansfield said. "I think he expressed some heartfelt sentiments." Kaplan, a Clinton supporter, said he would have liked the speech better if Obama more strongly renounced Wright's comments. Obama said he was unaware until recently of the most divisive of Wright's comments, but also praised him as someone as a man of God and compared Wright to a member of the family. Parker also said Obama did not go far enough to distance himself from Wright and explain why he remained a member of Wright's church. "Your family is your family, but you can pick and choose your church," she said. Cabral, on the other hand, said he admired Obama for "not throwing the pastor under the bus, like most politicians do." Paul Grady, chairman of the Attleboro Democratic City Committee, said he believes the Wright controversy will hurt Obama because the Illinois senator is still relatively unknown to the public. He said he wishes a candidate's private life could remain private. While Democrats were weighing how much the issue will hurt Obama in the Democratic primaries, Republicans were staying well clear of the controversy. Spokesmen for Republican candidate John McCain, the National Republican Committee, the Massachusetts Republican Party, the Republican State Committee and other groups all declined to comment.
Post Your Comments celt wrote on Apr 6, 2008 7:38 AM: " I suspect that the people who complain that Obama lacks substance have never really listened to him and instead get their opinions secondhand from talk show hosts. It is a sad state of affairs, indeed, when we distrust a person BECAUSE he is articulate. I can’t see that McCain is brimming with substance. He is simply offering to “stay the course” which has been a disaster so far. Four more years with a Bush clone? No thanks.
" kevin h. wrote on Apr 4, 2008 3:00 PM: " Deval Patrick and 0bama parrot inspiring words from the past and act like they are true leaders for the future. But just look at how poorly prepared Patrick is to be governor. Same for 0bama, it's all fluff. These guys aren't worthy enough to tie the shoes of MLK or JFK (or many other initials I won't list.) They are TV hosts and it's sad that today’s society is so emotionally unanchored, and civically challenged that they could fall victim of these empty suits selling their snake oil.
" celt wrote on Mar 20, 2008 3:54 PM: " This ire against Obama is so phony. Let’s face it conservatives are scared to death of Obama and they are digging in the dirt to find any offense, real or imagined. So they were able to find that Obama’s FORMER minister said things that would offend some people. Some of my closest friends say things that I disagree with – so what? Am I supposed to run away from them? Talk about political correctness. Some people are dumb enough to imagine that this is a worse offense than running the country into the ground as Bush and the conservative Republicans like John McCain have done or worse than the lying that led to Clinton's impeachment. If you want more incompetence, dishonesty, and greed then go ahead and vote for more of the same. If you want a leader with integrity, vote for Obama. " skeptic wrote on Mar 20, 2008 2:03 PM: " To celtic -- you are correct. The ability to communicate well is a sign of intelligence. However, communication implies conveying information. His speech is not conveying information. He is entertaining, not communicating. ie, he says nothing but can hold one's attention while saying it. " Realist wrote on Mar 20, 2008 1:23 PM: " Seriously, this wasn't much of a story. Of course the dems were going to praise it and the Republicans would reserver comment because lest they be declared racist.
As for defending his staying with a church with that minister, Obama was not raised in that church. He after, as the press said, sampling other religions, chose this church. And believe me if a priest ever got up on the pulpit and said God D**N America and we brought 9/11 on ourselves, the bishop would remove him. " Realist wrote on Mar 20, 2008 1:12 PM: " For discussions on Obama's lack of substance http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2008/02/obama-actually.html
" celt wrote on Mar 20, 2008 11:33 AM: " The argument that Obama is simply a good speaker with no substance is nonsense. I don’t see any evidence that McCain or Clinton provide more substance than Obama. The ability to communicate clearly is a sign of intelligence. One of the most important roles any leader provides is to articulate the thoughts and goals of the people he or she is leading. This whole brouhaha over Obama’s minister is a farce. I was raised as a Catholic and I can assure you that if every Catholic who disagreed with their priest left the church, there would be almost no one left. " kevin h. wrote on Mar 20, 2008 11:05 AM: " Barack a talkshow host, a showman, and there is a sucker born every minute. He isn't a great leader or thinker. If he was, he would have already distanced himself from this angry racial arsonist. His chickens have come home.............to roost! " Skeptic wrote on Mar 20, 2008 10:39 AM: " The pundits are now comparing this speech to Kennedy or Lincoln. The gist, "racism is bad, get past it".
Sadly my comments are based on excerpts since no one broadcast the speech. I will try to find it on line and READ it, not view it. I find that when I read his speeches they tend to be without any real content. It's all in the delivery. He's selling the sizzle, there is no steak. " or
|