34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Dumas ready to take on ARA project




Mayor says step may be needed to save renewal
ATTLEBORO - Mayor Kevin Dumas says he is ready to take control of downtown revitalization efforts from the Attleboro Redevelopment Authority if that's what's needed to save the project.

Dumas said he doesn't want to wrest control from the ARA, but he and his administration will "do what we have to do."

The effort would create a substantial burden because the administration's takeover of the debt-ridden industrial park project from the ARA last summer already chews up 75 percent of the city hall workday, the mayor said, forcing long hours on a number of administrators, including himself.

"It's a Herculean task," he told the city council Tuesday. "I certainly don't want another project in my hands, but you have my commitment we will do what we have to do."

Last week, Dumas blasted the funding scheme for the downtown project, saying the ARA has failed to get financial commitments from key government agencies, leaving the $15 million first phase of the project $5 million in the red. ARA members and administration officials are working to resolve that problem.

While Dumas said he doesn't want to take on responsibility for downtown, he believes the project is in dire straits.

"We've heard from the ARA that things are fine with downtown, but things are not fine with downtown," he said.

The ARA does not have crucial commitments from the MBTA and state's Executive Office of Transportation for funding, he said.

If the city intervenes, staff will be needed, Dumas said.

The mayor said hiring an economic development director would be key, and the job would be funded by grants.

"I really believe that's the next step," Dumas said.

Meanwhile, councilors praised Dumas, saying his takeover of the industrial business park project enabled it to avert foreclosure and gain a toehold on financial stability.

A deal worked out by Dumas and the city's Director of Budget and Administration Barry LaCasse to bring a Rhode Island seafood company to the industrial business park is the single biggest step forward in recent months, and is expected to funnel $300,000 into the project.

That is expected to help the project start clawing its way out of a massive $3 million to $4 million debt. LaCasse said the deal is expected to close in December.

About $90,000 of the $300,000 will be held in escrow to pay a year's worth of interest on an ARA bank loan.

The city will get at least $15,000 as a first payment on the $101,000 it loaned to the project. The city loan freed up part of a $600,000 federal grant, which in turn was used to pay off construction costs.

A $118,000 loan from the water department freed up additional grant money to build a key water main.

The remainder of the $300,000 will be divided by two former landowners who went to court seeking and winning higher payments from the ARA for their property that became part of the park.

All told, about $1.3 million is owed to the former landowners.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 27 comment(s) « Hide Comments

attlebrockton wrote on Oct 8, 2009 7:55 PM:

" This whole project is being held up by two people on the ARA board. It is time for Mr. Volterra & Mr. Steveson to resign like their former board member Mr. Symth. The director has demonstrated on numerous ocassions that he has neither the expertise or temperment to handle his position.Furthermore his compensation given his performance is embarrasing and speaks to not only to the arrogant nature of the ARA but more importantly the ivory tower attitude with which they conduct their affairs.One can only hope that a true audit and investigation behind the curtain of the Wizard will produce some explanation for the situation we as taxpayers now find ourselves in . "

GetItRight wrote on Oct 8, 2009 7:08 PM:

" The Mayor rocks. Keep up the great work!!! "

steves wrote on Oct 8, 2009 6:30 PM:

" I think the Mayor is doing a great job at something that should not even be on his plate.
That being said even if you think he is doing a bad job at least he is doing something. How long have these projects sat idle, how much has been spent on nothing? I suppose at $10,000/month just for M.M.'s salary he has no incentive to actually finish, or even do anything! The way I understand it all his stalling and inaction is the reason the money pool has dried up. "

ricknkim wrote on Oct 8, 2009 6:16 PM:

" I think you're totally inaccurate Bear claiming Dumas is primarily motivated by self-interest in the downtown development/ARA/IBP. I may not always see eye to eye with Dumas, but I do believe he does his job with his best interest in the city getting better. Of course he is a politician so there is motivation for his "projects" to be successful and thus show him as successful for reelection purposes.

However, I think you are way off base calling him a dictator/sheriff/etc. - people sometimes claim these things about others who are confident and have passion for a topic/cause and are driven. The mayor has his "issues" but don't make baseless claims solely because you have a personal grudge against him. Let me ask you, do you think you could do half as good a job at running a city than he? I think it is a harder job than most of us think. "

s-plumb wrote on Oct 8, 2009 5:07 PM:

" oh that money...get real "

bear wrote on Oct 8, 2009 4:58 PM:

" The money ha had control over was the block grant money that he allowed MM to pad his salary with. "

attle wrote on Oct 8, 2009 4:52 PM:

" I like the bricks and light poles. Thank you Sheriff. "

s-plumb wrote on Oct 8, 2009 4:51 PM:

" What money did the mayor have control over? Milanoski is either connected to (apparently) McGovern, protected by loop-holes or both.
He has already taken down 1 mayor and a council person viewed as allies, but he's still around.
I'd rather have an accountable "sheriff" I didn't agree with, than a cancer that cannot be controlled. "

bear wrote on Oct 8, 2009 4:35 PM:

" To Steve - I always think that accountability is a good thing. With that said, The sheriff has put himself AND the city in this position. Milanowski has been there since the little dictator decided to vote for the first time. He allowed the monster (Milanowski) to pad his salary by giving the ARA the money they were asking for without question.

To Late - You have no idea what you are talking about. I have never thought the ARA was doing a good job, or that this downtown project would ever happen. I also thought that Ides Hill should be destroyed for a project that would fail.

To Snarky - Actually it would be a cave, not a rock ;)
If the sheriff HAD actually worked with the ARA from the begininng that would be a different story. The fact is that he was so out of his league when he started his first term that he couldn't see that the monster (MM) was getting what he wanted (salary) instead of doing what was in the best interest of the city. "

snarky wrote on Oct 8, 2009 3:54 PM:

" Yeah bear...crawl back under the rock you came out from. This mayor has tried to work with the ARA for years. Just because he is putting his foot down now doesn't mean he is a dictator. He gave those bozos enough chances and I am glad to see him holding their feet to the fire. "

late to the party wrote on Oct 8, 2009 3:40 PM:

" Bear, you sound like you are on the ARA. Or should I say the old ARA. If not, you would have made a great candidate for the seat a few years ago when the ARA didn't know the definition of accountability. Sounds like you have some sour feelings toward Mayor Dumas because he is actually making the ARA explain themselves and show for something. The great thing about what is happening now is that the Mayor and the City are proving they were right all along. The ARA cannot sweet talk themselves out of there painted corner this time. Good job, Mayor Dumas and keep up the great work!!! "

s-plumb wrote on Oct 8, 2009 2:37 PM:

" bear: Do you feel accountability is wrong? For an entire decade we had no say in what Milanoski stole from us. Though I don't envy the mayor's situation, he's attempted to take control of something thats been run into the ground by Milanoski; the untouchable. "

bear wrote on Oct 8, 2009 1:51 PM:

" Rabbelrouser - you can "thank" sheriff kevin for the bricks and light poles not the ARA. "

rabblerouser wrote on Oct 8, 2009 1:42 PM:

" steves, Following are the answers to your 3 questions:
1)No permanant new job creations to show for, just their own salaries getting paid generously. New lightpoles and bricks and loss of parking spaces.
2)The impact of dissolving the whole thing, priceless, the lawyers for both sides would love that.
3)Their true operating costs per year, again priceless, where else can you get so little for in return for so much expense.
It would make for a great Black comedy,
Greek or Roman tragedy screenplays if it wasn't for the poor taxpayers footing the bill. Just my own opinion and "Just Words" as "Caddy" Deval says. "

bear wrote on Oct 8, 2009 1:35 PM:

" Doubts about this administration Doug - you better believe it! Oh, sorry it's Sheriff Kevin right? I want to get that straight. This guy is a dictator and not in the best interest of the city, but for his own gain.

As for this downtown ARA project - it will never happen. I don't understand Steve why you continue to lump Jim McGovern in with Milanowski? It seems to me that Jim McGovern has done what a rep. is supposed to do - get funding for a project like this. He has continualy told the ARA and the administration to get together and get this project going. The ARA has demanding more money (MM huge salary) and the administration refusing to work with the ARA (the sheriff acting the dictator role). "

steves wrote on Oct 8, 2009 12:09 PM:

" Does the ARA have anything to show for their cost to the city?
What would be the impact of dissolving the whole thing?
What is their true operating cost per year?
Can anyone answer these questions for me? "

s-plumb wrote on Oct 8, 2009 12:06 PM:

" 1)I don't believe the average citizen knew (or would believe) that their tax dollars were being used against them and their elected representatives. At this level, who would expect this? If it were written about when it happened the author would be branded as part of the "tin foil" hat braggade.

2)I get why the mayor stepped forward, but with a team of Milanoski & McGovern, he probably will be in for a rough ride. "

ricknkim wrote on Oct 8, 2009 11:27 AM:

" Lobbying and PR firms are part of life in business and government - there is no outrage because it is commonplace. Not to say their roles aren't often less than perfect . . . . "

doug wrote on Oct 8, 2009 11:26 AM:

" Do any of you have any doubts about the leadership of our current city administration? Our mayor and his staff understand what accountability means. Milanoski doesn't...didn't! Obviously a majority of the ARA board didn't either!!! "

s-plumb wrote on Oct 8, 2009 10:24 AM:

" The lobbying firm:
Led a "grassroots effort"!

WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE? "

s-plumb wrote on Oct 8, 2009 10:21 AM:

" The lobbying firm:
"... penned op-eds." These were fake latters to the editor! "

s-plumb wrote on Oct 8, 2009 10:15 AM:

" Have you seen any grassroots efforts? This is a lobbying firm. You paid for them! "

s-plumb wrote on Oct 8, 2009 10:13 AM:

" "ONeill and Associates grassroots efforts also yielded a successful Municipal Council vote in favor of the Urban Renewal Plan. As a result, the Downtown Development Plan is now moving forward in Attleboro, and will be one of the Commonwealths leading smart growth communities once it is completed." "

s-plumb wrote on Oct 8, 2009 10:12 AM:

" Perhaps this is a better way to make the case against this paper, the ARA, and McGovern. WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?
This is from the lobbying firm hired with our tax dollars and used against us:

"ONeill and Associates also collaborated with ARA officials to present at public meetings in an effort to gauge community sentiment and proactively address concerns early on. To insure that the messages reached all intended groups, ONeill and Associates coordinated meetings between ARA representatives and key elected officials, MBTA and FTA officials, community opinion leaders, opinion groups, media outlets and other key influencers. ONeill and Associates also monitored news coverage, identified signatories for letters of support and penned op-eds." "

kevin h. wrote on Oct 8, 2009 7:38 AM:

" WHy are we paying twice for the same job done poorly? DISSOLVE THE ARA NOW!!! "

cosmo wrote on Oct 8, 2009 7:03 AM:

" Bottom line----he needs to be replaced by someone we can trust and respect. This man is a joke to Attleboro! "

attlebrockton wrote on Oct 8, 2009 6:19 AM:

" How can he stayed employed???What about the board?? Where is their oversight MAX, Pret, Don was smart to get out when he saw the hand writing on the wall. This group led by this man has trampled on countless number of city land owners & taxpayers.At what point does the Bristol County DA become involved? "