News
Voters oust four school incumbents
Top Headlines In a result reminiscent of 2005, when only three school committee incumbents were returned to office, voters turned out sitting school board members who had served up to a dozen years. The Ward 5 race, won by incumbent Frances Zito over newcomer David Sidman by only seven votes, appeared headed for a recount. Newcomer James Stors took a whopping 69 percent of the vote in defeating Ward 2 incumbent Shawn Moran; Brenda Furtado scored a 71 percent win over Jackie Romaniecki in Ward 4; and former school board member Bruce Levine narrowly edged out incumbent Michael Tyler in Ward 6, taking 53 percent of the vote. In at-large races, challengers Raymond DiCiaccio and Teri Enegren proved the top vote-getters, with incumbent Helen Johnson also elected by virtue of her third-place finish in the four-way race. Two-term incumbent and school committee Chairwoman Roberta Wuilleumier fell out of the running, more than 250 votes behind in fourth place. Among incumbents who survived, only Ward 1's Melissa Cook prevailed with a large majority, defeating challenger George Lukin by 194 votes. Robert Hill was unopposed in Ward 3. "There seemed to be a bit of anti-incumbent feeling out there," said Stors, who defeated Moran, 546 votes to 240, of the sweeping changes on the board. "That, and the new people did a lot of work - and that hard work paid off." Others saw a mandate for change on the school board. "The community is really looking for change," Enegren said, adding that she believes the newly elected members will be able to work with the holdovers in a constructive posture for education. "I think we can move in a really positive direction with a lot of teamwork," she said. "We have a lot of good people, and if everyone is level-headed, we'll be just fine." Candidates who challenged established incumbents had attacked hard over what some described as the committee's failure to speak up to or properly supervise the school department's top administration. Their opponents countered that schools were moving forward steadily with new programs, grants and curriculum improvements and that the school committee was not shirking its duty. Johnson said she was "disappointed" with the election's outcome, including the loss of Wuilleumier and Romaniecki, two of the board's most experienced members. "I don't know what they're looking for," Johnson said of voters. She said schools were making progress on several fronts and that the school committee of the last four years has for the most part banished the dissension and bickering that was commonplace prior to 2006. Zito said she was also saddened by the election results, but predicted the old and new members will be able to work together for the betterment of the school system. She also complimented her opponent, Sidman, as "a gentleman." Sidman said Zito had proven to be a tough opponent. Due to the close, seven-vote margin, Sidman said he plans to request a recount today. RICK FOSTER can be reached at 508-236-0360 or at rfoster@thesunchronicle.com.
View Comments » 19 comment(s)
« Hide Comments
|
kevin goodwin wrote on Nov 4, 2009 5:47 PM:
The Watcher wrote on Nov 4, 2009 4:45 PM:
sunshinesonfire wrote on Nov 4, 2009 4:39 PM:
reality101 wrote on Nov 4, 2009 4:31 PM:
sunshinesonfire wrote on Nov 4, 2009 4:23 PM:
to "THE WATCHER" and not "WATCHER2" (very original) I have just spoken to four people, and we are not sure how that works. Maybe there would need to be a special election, not sure. In my OPINION, because I don't know the rules, she was next in votes, so I would assume the seat would be offered to her. Or maybe there is a special election. I don't know. "
watcher2 wrote on Nov 4, 2009 4:16 PM:
The Watcher wrote on Nov 4, 2009 2:11 PM:
I believe that RW would not move up if this were to occur. Johnson was elected by the people (perhaps because of no other choices, and the people spoke loud and clear in regards to RW. Wouldn't they have to now run a special election to fill the spot? Does the current SC appoint someone to fill the position? These are interesting quesions? "
wilson wrote on Nov 4, 2009 1:51 PM:
Thank you "
sunshinesonfire wrote on Nov 4, 2009 1:21 PM:
sunshinesonfire wrote on Nov 4, 2009 1:20 PM:
What I disagree with are things like her annual review (can be viewed in the action notes on the school website). She was given rave reviews in EVERY area. There is nothing wrong with saying: you are strong in areas A, B, and C, but lacking in areas D, E, and F. The school committee should be praising the good and giving guidance in areas that need improvement. I do not currently see that happening.
Let's face it, we would all like to have a job where we answer to noone, but that is simply unrealistic. The current school board is not currently governing our schools. "
wilson wrote on Nov 4, 2009 1:15 PM:
ricknkim wrote on Nov 4, 2009 12:32 PM:
It is far from easy being a teacher, education administrator or school committee member. Sometimes I think parents have no clue as to what is involved in the educating process and are too quick to point a finger when their precious little Johnny gets called out. Yes, your little Johnny is far from perfect even if you don't see it. Sometimes parents are spot-on when they complain too, of course. If everyone involved always kept anchored to the ideal "in the best interest of the students" there would be less in-fighting, sniping and problems. Lead by example folks, your children are watching and listening . . . "
FourthStreet wrote on Nov 4, 2009 9:25 AM:
sunshinesonfire wrote on Nov 4, 2009 9:01 AM:
Our middle school students went six weeks without snack last year: that is six weeks of parents calling the school committee, the principals, the teachers, the superintendant, the MAYOR's office! And all that time, the school committee did nothing but keep tabling to the next meeting, hoping the raucus would die down.
Helen Johnson, here is what the voters are looking for: Parents want to know they are well represented. "
backofthepack wrote on Nov 4, 2009 8:45 AM:
and she is the one who got re-elected...sad. "
watcher2 wrote on Nov 4, 2009 8:17 AM:
wilson wrote on Nov 4, 2009 7:56 AM:
You will now have to answer to the people for your actions. "
kevin h. wrote on Nov 4, 2009 7:34 AM:
I can't believe you said that.
Way to represent. "
mtaxi12@yahoo.com wrote on Nov 4, 2009 6:33 AM: