News
Residents share health care reform concerns
Top Headlines McGovern, D-Worcester, held a telephone town hall meeting during which constituents from his district were able to question him in a teleconference. The congressman said the bill will hold down costs, cut the federal budget deficit, offer coverage to millions of uninsured Americans and ban companies from denying coverage to customers with pre-existing medical conditions. But his constituents apparently wanted reassurance. A man identified as Richard from North Attleboro asked if members of Congress would be enrolled in a government insurance plan that the bill would create under the so-called "public option." McGovern said members of Congress would be able to chose whether they wanted the public plan or a private one such as Blue Cross. "The public option is just that - an option," McGovern said. "Members of Congress will be given the same option as everyone else. If it makes sense, I'd be stupid not to opt in. I wouldn't be forced into a public option, and neither would you." McGovern, whose district includes several communities in the Attleboro area, said the public option is needed to provide competition to private insurers to encourage them to hold down costs. If nothing is done, he said, insurance premiums will continue to rise at an annual rate of $1,800 per family. But McGovern also heard from the other side of the argument. A woman identified as Susan in Worcester wanted to know why he was not supporting a stronger version of the public option. The congressman said everyone has to compromise to get a bill that could get majority support. "Look, this is not perfect, but to insist on the perfect and have Congress do nothing is unacceptable," he said. "This is a good bill. It's not perfect, but it is still a good bill." A caller from Boylston asked how much the $1 trillion bill will cost an average family in new taxes. McGovern said the bill is paid for with a surcharge tax on individuals making more than $500,000 and families making more than $1 million. A woman identified as Irene from Worcester wanted to know about abortion coverage. McGovern said the bill and previous federal law prohibit federal funding for abortions. McGovern said he believes Congress is about to fulfill the health care goals set by presidents dating back to Teddy Roosevelt and Harry Truman. "I believe we are on the cusp of a historic moment," he said. JIM HAND covers politics for The Sun Chronicle. He can be reached at 508-236-0399 or at jhand@thesunchronicle.com.
View Comments » 3 comment(s)
« Hide Comments
|
kevin h. wrote on Nov 5, 2009 10:46 AM:
the reaction should be NO PLAN AT ALL!!!
We have government health care ... it's called the VA. If they treat our heroes that poorly, how badly do you think they will treat us??? "
IShouldBeMayor wrote on Nov 5, 2009 8:48 AM:
Even if it were possible for the government to keep health care costs down, your taxes will go way up, so what is this plan really going to do?
A more realistic plan is needed, such as cross state competition. Start small and see what works. Don't force the whole country to use the failing Massachusetts health care plan "
kevin h. wrote on Nov 5, 2009 8:09 AM:
The government is already restricting our freedoms by taxing foods they don't like. When they have control over healthcare eventually you will have to call a government agency to see if what you eat fits their food allowance. If your kid lets the school know you fed them 3 eggs, are you going to get a call from the government?? This is the antithesis of what the founders wanted to protect, our God given right to self determination. It is frightening to see government become so intrusive in our lives. And it all comes from the fallacy that some say " If we don't control the health of others we all will have to pay for them." THAT is the problem!!! We all have freedom, and that means freedom to fail. And whatever happened to the 10th amendment which states that any powers not expressedly given to the federal governement by the Constituion are the States and the peoples. Federal mandated health insurance is unconstitutional. "