34 South Main St., Attleboro, MA - Directions - (508) 222-7000
Home News Sports Features classifieds milestones services photos tvlistings cars jobs realestate subscribe
News

Plainville residents getting street lights turned back on by paying out of pocket




PLAINVILLE - When town officials were deliberating on which street lights to turn off to save money and balance the town budget, Selectwoman Andrea Soucy suggested citizens adopt a light in their neighborhood to keep some on.

She said citizens could help keep the town a little less dark by pitching in to pay for the electricity to keep some lights on.

Then, she decided she should lead by example.

Soucy became the first person to volunteer to pay the $96-a-year cost of keeping a street light on.

"I said I would adopt it if there was a way to do that. I think if you are asking people to make a sacrifice, you ought to be the first to make it. Besides, it's only $8 to $10 a month," she said. Since taking the plunge, Soucy said a number of other residents have come up to her and said they also adopted a light.

Debbie Drew, a spokeswoman for National Grid, said 15 Plainville residents have agreed to pay for street lighting so far.

Despite the adoption program, the town still had to shut off more than 400 of its 650 street lights, Town Administrator Joseph Fernandes said.

The move was made with regret, he said, but it is saving the town about $40,000. Considering the difficult financial times, the town decided shutting off lights was better than laying off a police officer, firefighter or teacher.

Fernandes said other layoffs and budget cuts had already been made, so there is no where else to cut.

Few residents noticed the lights were out this summer, he said, but as the days grew shorter and Halloween approached, complaints started coming into his office.

Some parents have understandably complained that it is dark when their teenagers catch the high school bus in the morning, and the street lights should have stayed on, he said.

"This is a real concern for me, and I don't have a solution," he said.

The lights that have remained on are at intersections, on road curves and other locations where safety was a particular concern.

Soucy said she is hoping more lights can be turned on at school bus stops and where children play. The adoption program is one way of accomplishing that. She said she adopted the light on her street corner because it is a dead-end street that children play on.

"It's like Mayberry here," she said.

 


*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
View Comments » 17 comment(s) « Hide Comments

gimmesum wrote on Nov 6, 2009 5:01 PM:

" good question, s-plumb. Why are the lights "there"? "

gimmesum wrote on Nov 6, 2009 4:48 PM:

" getreal: we didn't have street lights. "

skeptic wrote on Nov 6, 2009 2:41 PM:

" Not that Plainville has huge crime problems but doesn't this policy favor those who can afford to pay for street lighting? "

s-plumb wrote on Nov 6, 2009 2:20 PM:

" Sunset is at 4:34pm, and we lose minutes each day. Basic safety as well as crime rates have always been related to lighting.
I don't think that all children should be locked in a house, and tucked into bed at 4pm, nor should taxpayers even feel their safety is compromised due to insufficient lighting.
Why are the lights there to begin with? "

getreal wrote on Nov 6, 2009 2:11 PM:

" gimmesum- Great point, but you've got it backwards. The rule was that you had to be home when the streetlights came ON...... "

gimmesum wrote on Nov 6, 2009 2:02 PM:

" Is there any direct corelation between crime/danger and street lights?

Even Ms Soucy said she only adopted a street light because children are at play.

We were always expected to be at home or in our yard when it was dark. "

realist wrote on Nov 6, 2009 12:01 PM:

" It's almost like govt extortion. You're paying taxes for services and now they want to bill some directly for a service others are getting already.
Why not shut off every single street light and tell homeowners and business people to chip in. Talk about a banana republic way of doing business. "

s-plumb wrote on Nov 6, 2009 11:40 AM:

" Errie omparison to the Carter years though. 0bama now has the national unemployment figure over 10%, and we're talking about turning off street lights; just like Carter-ville.
Did you hear his condolence speech yesterday, where he spent the 1st 2 min thanking the Native American lobbyist, for the good time he had, and then stated he must mention the killings at Ft Hood.
He just doesn't care about anyone or anything but himself. "

s-plumb wrote on Nov 6, 2009 11:34 AM:

" There may have been some areas that were darkened, but my recollection is that they turned off every-other street light...not sure if it makes a difference (or if my memory is working right) :) "

RLincoln wrote on Nov 6, 2009 9:07 AM:

" Perhaps they could do what North Attleboro did when my dad was a boy - turn off some of them, especially in rural areas not well-traveled, after 1 a.m., when almost nobody is on the road. It would be very unlikely to put anyone in danger, and would still leave the roads lit when people really need them. "

getreal wrote on Nov 6, 2009 8:31 AM:

" "It's like Mayberry here," she said.

Keep shutting off the lights and it'll be more like "Deliverance" "

Anna D wrote on Nov 6, 2009 8:21 AM:

" getreal is right; I'm confident there is a useless paper-pushing bureaucrat (or maybe two) who could have been fired to save the $40K, and thus not put people in jeopardy. "

Anna D wrote on Nov 6, 2009 8:19 AM:

" To paraphrase some wise (Republican, I believe) politician, $8 here, $8 there. Pretty soon you're talking real money.... "

Anna D wrote on Nov 6, 2009 8:18 AM:

" Government is like cancer. You have to kill it to cure yourself of the disease. I'm astonished that Plainville residents will put up with this. But then, maybe not... It is, after all, Massachusetts, where government keeps growing and growing (like a malignant tumor) and the voters refuse to stop it. "

getreal wrote on Nov 6, 2009 8:06 AM:

" Talk about a third world approach to cost-cutting. Endangering residents and children by plunging streets into darkness to save a few bucks...There ought to be legilation to prevent cities and towns from shutting off street lighting, along the same lines as utility companies can't shut off power/services to the elderly who may be sick or unable to pay their bill. Figure out another way to save money. There's likely some unnecessary school administrator they can unload and use that salary to light the streets. "

seaglass wrote on Nov 6, 2009 7:41 AM:

" I've been paying for the streetlight near my home in Seekonk for over 10 years. In fact, I thought it was a grandfathered service with National Grid and new customers cannot even sign up for residential streetlighting anymore. It does cost about $100/year and along with the annual trash fee and the trash bags, ANOTHER non tax-deductible cost that should be in our tax base. Yes, it is so dark and dangerous at night on my heavily traveled street. I cover the cost for the benefit and protection of my family.It's worth it while I can afford it and cheaper than an alarm system. "

seaglass wrote on Nov 6, 2009 7:40 AM:

" I've been paying for the streetlight near my home in Seekonk for over 10 years. In fact, I thought it was a grandfathered service with National Grid and new customers cannot even sign up for residential streetlighting anymore. It does cost about $100/year and along with the annual trash fee and the trash bags, ANOTHER non tax-deductible cost that should be in our tax base. Yes, it is so dark and dangerous at night on my heavily traveled street. I cover the cost for the benefit and protection of my family.It's worth it while I can afford it and cheaper than an alarm system. rhood benefits as well. "